By Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst
Specialists in argumentation concept current a view of argumentation as a way of resolving ameliorations of opinion through trying out the acceptability of the disputed positions. Their version of a "critical discussion" serves as a theoretical instrument for studying, comparing and generating argumentative discourse. This significant contribution to the research of argumentation can be of specific worth to execs and graduate scholars in speech communique, casual common sense, rhetoric, serious pondering, linguistics, and philosophy.
Read or Download A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach PDF
Best rhetoric books
Via a serious research of historic African texts that predate Greco-Roman treatises Cecil Blake revisits the roots of rhetorical idea and demanding situations what's usually complicated because the "darkness metaphor" -- the rhetorical development of Africa and Africans. Blake bargains a radical exam of Ptah-hotep and center African moral rules (Maat) and engages rhetorical scholarship in the wider discourse of African improvement.
The data such a lot worthy Having represents the essence of schooling on the collage of Chicago—faculty and scholars grappling with key highbrow questions that span the arts, whereas nonetheless acknowledging the necessity to collect a intensity of information in one’s selected box. The papers accumulated right here have been brought in the course of an often-heated convention on the college in 1966, and contain contributions from such students as Northrop Frye, Richard McKeon, and, in fact, the dean of the varsity, Wayne sales space himself.
This ebook examines the growth of literacy in historical Greece from its origins within the 8th century to the fourth century B. C. E. , while the foremost cultural associations of Athens turned completely depending on alphabetic literacy. through introducing new facts and re-evaluating the older proof, Robb demonstrates that early Greek literacy could be understood basically when it comes to the wealthy oral tradition that instantly preceded it, person who used to be ruled via the oral functionality of epical verse, or "Homer.
Columbus is the 1st blazing big name in a constellation of eu adventurers whose correct to assert and triumph over every one land mass they encountered was once totally unquestioned by way of their countrymen. How a procedure of spiritual ideals made the taking of the hot international attainable and laudable is the focal point of Kadir's well timed assessment of the founding doctrines of empire.
- The Philosophy of Rhetoric (Galaxy Books)
- Critical Power Tools: Technical Communication and Cultural Studies (Suny Series, Studies in Scientific and Technical Communication)
- Manly Writing: Gender, Rhetoric and the Rise of Compostion
- Logical Self-Defense
- Ulysses and the Poetics of Cognition (Routledge Studies in Rhetoric and Stylistics)
Additional info for A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach
These proposals should take account of the institutional objectives that a speciﬁc argumentative practice is supposed to serve. In any case, when developing methods or proposals for achieving practical improvements, optimal use will have to be made of the insights in the production, analysis, and evaluation of argumentative discourse that have been acquired in research carried out in the philosophical, theoretical, analytical, and empirical estates. These insights must be carefully translated into recommendations that satisfy the divergent criteria that apply to argumentative discourse in the various ﬁelds of application.
Do the argument schemes and argumentation structures distinguished in the pragma-dialectical argumentation theory indeed play some kind of steering role in everyday argumentative practice? And are there indications that ordinary arguers, when interpreting one another’s argumentation, are indeed carrying out transformations that are in some way similar to those used by the dialecticians? These kinds of questions are tackled by empirical researchers concerned with producing descriptions of argumentative discourse concentrated on the process of convincing.
All kinds of experiments have been carried out to ﬁnd out more about this. Because for persuasionoriented rhetoricians the result of the argumentative process counts above all, they tend to be more interested in the “material” factors affecting the result than in the psychological processes in which these factors operate. Persuasion is, in principle, connected with immediate reactions: The audience carries out a certain verbal or non-verbal act, or decides not to carry it out. This may explain why many of the 26 Van Eemeren, Grootendorst, and Meuffels (1989) report on a series of experimental tests concerning the recognition of argumentation in which these two “operationalizations” play a role.